2026 Oregon Big Game Preview

July 15, 2026

Share This Article

New mule deer hunt areas highlight changes for this fall.

By Jim Yuskavitch

A mild winter followed by a likely hot, dry summer are the bookends between which this year’s big game prospects are lodged. The mild, lean-snow winter made for easier access to forage and minimal winter mortality for both adults and offspring. But a droughty summer, especially if it’s severe and lengthy, will give big game animals a challenge to navigate. Such summer weather conditions could also affect hunter access for the upcoming season if large swaths of timberlands are closed due to wildfire danger, especially if the risk continues well into the fall where it will affect more hunts.

But overall, it looks like hunters will encounter generally healthy numbers of deer, elk and other big game, with exceptions here and there. A selection of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists from around the state offered their views on big game numbers and how things might shake out for hunters this year. Here’s what they had to say.

Deer

Black-tailed deer populations within their range west of the Cascades have been making what appears to be a steady comeback over the past five years or so. Reasons for past lower numbers included predation, habitat changes and disease. More recent surveys show a stable population along with gains in some wildlife management units.

Deer hair loss syndrome is still present in Coast Range animals, and at one time was widespread. It’s less common now, and because it doesn’t cause much mortality, it’s no longer a particular concern.

“Overall, things are looking good for black-tailed deer on the North Coast,” said Tillamook-based Assistant District Wildlife Biologist Austin Reeder. “Deer numbers are looking strong.” He did express some concern over the mild winter, which, while good for deer and elk survival, might affect the severity of the fire season. That will be the general situation all the way down the Coast Range.

The status for black-tailed deer along the west slope of the Cascade Range is equally good. 

“Our deer are doing pretty well, and the numbers are going up,” reported Assistant District Wildlife Biologist Alejandra Martinez, who works out of the Springfield office. “We’re seeing lots of young bucks, but the older, bigger bucks are getting harder to find on the landscape.”

That’s setting off alarm bells because that relatively recent decline in trophy buck numbers is due largely to poachers’ increasing use of thermal imaging devices to locate animals.

Under current rules, if you are in possession of a firearm, tag and thermal device, you are breaking the law. 

The situation is serious enough that industrial timberlands owners are getting involved. If someone hunting in the East Lane Travel Management Area is caught with a thermal imaging device, they and their entire party will be permanently banned from the property.

East of the Cascades, in mule deer country, the situation is different. Mule deer populations have been declining across the western U.S. for a number of years and Oregon’s mule deer haven’t been spared. There are multiple causes for this decline, but habitat degradation and loss is the primary culprit.

But that doesn’t mean all is doom and gloom for hunting prospects. Even with an ongoing population-wide decline, deer numbers can still be up in particular places. That’s the current case for northeast Oregon mule deer.

“Deer are doing pretty good,” said Enterprise-based Assistant District Wildlife Biologist Katrina Lopez. “We had a significantly high survival rate over the winter, and we are above all our goals.”

Northeast Oregon is also white-tailed deer country, and this year deer in the Wallowa Valley had some problems with Epizootic hemorrhagic disease, or EHD, a viral infection that can cause extensive hemorrhaging and is sometimes fatal.

“But we still have lots of white-tailed deer and good hunting opportunities, especially in the national forest, upper Wallowa Valley, and the Lostine and Wenaha areas,” said Lopez.

Further south in High Desert country, Hines-based District Wildlife Biologist Lee Foster reported, “We had a mild winter with good overwinter survival. Our buck ratios are at or above management objectives.” 

He noted that beginning this year, ODFW is implementing new hunt areas for deer that, in addition to potentially boosting hunter success rates, will give the agency additional data for tracking and assessing mule deer numbers.

On a more negative note, Foster added, “It looks like we are going into a drought this year. The desert is going to be very dry, and water will be a valuable commodity.”

ODFW estimates the current mule deer population in Oregon at 113,084 within 77 hunt units — well below the statewide management objective of 346,200.

Elk

Although Roosevelt elk herds are not doing as well overall as their eastern Oregon counterparts, hunters can expect decent hunting opportunities along the Coast Range, driven partially by the mild winter and ongoing logging operations on private timberlands that produce early seral-stage vegetation. 

Austin Reeder reported that his North Coast elk herds are fine and are at management objective in the Saddle Mountain Unit.

It’s a different story along the west slope of the Cascade Range. 

“Elk are still having difficulty in the Cascades,” explained Alejandra Martinez. “The habitat isn’t as good as it used to be due to a decline in logging that opened up habitat for them.”

Unlike the Coast Range, where considerable acreage is in active commercial timberlands ownership, the majority of the Cascades is managed by the U.S. Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management where the number of timber sales has dropped considerably over the past three decades.

While wildfire on the Cascade landscape does open habitat to new growth, it doesn’t help elk as much as one might assume. Christopher Yee, wildlife biologist also based in Springfield, pointed out that while both deer and elk use areas after a fire, elk don’t respond with a big population jump the way deer do. ODFW has stopped offering cow tags in the Cascades to help stem the decline, but that is really their only tool, because it’s the federal government that manages the habitat.

“Habitat,” said Martinez, “is our biggest concern.”

As is typical, the scenario for Rocky Mountain elk in northeast Oregon is considerably better.

“Elk had really good survival over the year and roughly the same numbers as last year,” said Katrina Lopez of the Enterprise ODFW office. “We had a mild winter, and the elk stayed up in the forest a little longer.”

She did note that they are going into drought conditions and that may result in poor forage, which – along with predation – could affect elk numbers over the course of the year.

The biggest challenge to elk hunters in that part of the state may be access rather than elk numbers. Industrial timberlands owner Manulife has ended its public access agreement with ODFW’s Access and Habitat Program to 270,000 acres in northeast Oregon along with another 12,400 acres in southwest Oregon.

While not known for its elk hunting, the High Desert region does provide some opportunity, mainly in the Silvies, North Malheur and High Desert units. Lee Foster reported some good news in that, after years of struggling with low bull ratios, they are now at management objective in the North Malheur Unit. 

Foster noted that, “Calf ratios were not that great this year. That’s a result of the winter kill from winter of 2024-25 that reduced cow elk numbers.” Because of that delayed effect, hunters will be seeing fewer spike bulls this year than is typical.

The current Roosevelt elk population estimate is 48,944. Management objective is 70,850. There are an estimated 67,394 Rocky Mountain elk in the state, just shy of the 73,450 objective.

Pronghorn

“We had a really good crop two years ago,” said Lee Foster. “They won’t be mature bucks this year, but they will be next year. Hopefully, hunters will recognize that.”

He did note that the hard winter of 2024-25 also took a bite out of the pronghorn population, although the impacts were most severe in the southern part of Lake County.

The current pronghorn population is estimated at 25,000.

Bighorn Sheep

Both Lopez in Enterprise and Foster in Hines reported that their bighorn herds – Rocky Mountain bighorns and California bighorns, respectively – are doing well with no recent disease issues. Lopez noted that the last pneumonia outbreak in her district was the Wenaha herd in 2024.

Nevertheless, ODFW continues to monitor bighorn herds statewide for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae, or Movi, infections. In February, working with the Hells Canyon Bighorn Sheep Recovery Initiative partners, ODFW biologists captured and GPS collared 59 Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep from the Mountain View herd and another 29 from the Wenaha Wildlife Area as part of its ongoing disease testing work.

General estimates for bighorn populations in Oregon are 900 to 1,000 Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep and 4,000 California bighorns.

Rocky Mountain Goat

Oregon’s Rocky Mountain goat population continues to do well and is largely stable. The estimated population is 1,100 to 1,300 with most in the Elkhorn and Wallowa Mountains, along with herds in the Strawberry Mountains and central Cascades around Mount Jefferson.

Lopez noted that two tags have been cut from the Snake River Herd hunt as ODFW felt they had been taking out too many nannies.


Recent Posts

By Ellen Condon • October 5, 2026
October 5th, 2026 | Oregon Hunters Association | OHA News | Management practices must target management objectives Currently, only 59% (20) of wildlife management units (WMUs) are above the population management objective (MO) for Rocky Mountain elk. Meanwhile, on the west side of the state, just 17% (3) of WMUs for Roosevelt elk are meeting their population management goals. In WMUs where elk populations are at or above their population MO, OHA strongly supports abundant antlerless elk hunting opportunities. This is adaptive management: when a resource exceeds established objectives, increased hunting opportunities should follow. Unfortunately, Rocky Mountain elk populations are below MO in 41% (14) of WMUs, while Roosevelt elk populations are below MO in 83% (15) of WMUs across Oregon. Many factors influence elk population trends, including forage quality and quantity, predation, development, disturbance (such as road density), and, to a lesser extent, disease. OHA is working to address all of these limiting factors. However, antlerless elk harvest can also have a significant impact on elk population size. Debates about the effects of these various factors on elk populations are warranted and should be part of the management discussion. However, hunters should not overlook the fact that increasing antlerless elk harvest is the primary way to reduce elk population size. While supporting robust antlerless elk hunting opportunities in WMUs at or above population MO, OHA is also advocating for a thorough review of antlerless elk tag allocations, including general-season antlerless elk damage tags, in areas where elk populations are not meeting management objectives. Rocky Mountain elk bull ratios are currently below MO in at least 17 WMUs, while Roosevelt elk bull ratios are below MO in at least eight WMUs. OHA supports efforts to address low bull ratios in the Coast Range and is encouraging the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to address low bull ratios statewide. Above all, OHA is emphasizing the need to revise Oregon’s Elk Management Plan, which was published 23 years ago.
By Ellen Condon • September 27, 2026
September 27th, 2026 | Oregon Hunters Association | OHA News | The Oregon Hunters Association (OHA) is supporting an effort to remove cougars in the Trout Creek Mountains to improve the success of future bighorn sheep translocations. The effort is intended to help establish and strengthen the existing herd as wildlife managers work to address its declining population and genetic diversity. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) plans to translocate bighorn sheep in the near future to supplement the existing herd and enhance its genetic diversity. Successfully establishing these animals in their new surroundings will be an important part of that effort. Cougar predation has negatively affected bighorn sheep translocation efforts in Oregon, highlighting the challenges associated with introducing animals to a new landscape. Previous translocations have demonstrated how predation can affect the number of sheep that remain in an area following their release. In the early 2000s, three of the 17 bighorn sheep released during a translocation along the Minam River were killed by cougars within one week. In a separate translocation in the Steens Mountains, five of the 10 collared ewes were killed by cougars. In both instances, the remaining sheep scattered and left the area, further complicating the efforts to establish the animals in their intended locations. “The science is clear,” said OHA Conservation Director Tyler Dungannon. “If you want to successfully translocate bighorn sheep, in most cases, you need to first reduce predator densities and remove individuals that will prey upon the naïve ungulates that are new to the landscape.” OHA believes this effort will improve the likelihood of success for future bighorn sheep translocations in the Trout Creek Mountains. By addressing predation concerns ahead of the planned releases, the effort aims to support the existing herd and help improve its population size and genetic diversity over time. Although the primary objective is to benefit bighorn sheep, the effort may also have benefits for other wildlife in the region. The Trout Creek mule deer herd occupies a range currently listed as “very high management concern” in the Oregon Mule Deer Management Plan. While not the primary focus of the cougar removal effort, potential benefits to this mule deer herd provide an additional conservation consideration.
By Ellen Condon • September 26, 2026
September 26th, 2026 | Oregon Hunters Association | OHA News | OHA worked with USFS and ODFW this summer to protect 480 acres across three areas in the Cascade Mountains: Willow Prairie, Short Creek Prairie and Whiskey Springs. The project included 6.5 miles of wildlife-friendly fencing. Volunteers also removed nearly as much old, dilapidated fencing. Meadow systems across the western Cascades are at risk of loss, degradation and fragmentation due to conifer encroachment, heavy use by domestic livestock, wildfire suppression and other factors. Willow Prairie and Whiskey Springs are high-risk groundwater infiltration areas that provide spring water for the Big Butte Springs Municipal Watershed, which supplies drinking water to approximately 140,000 people in the region. Wet meadow and spring systems provide critical habitat for a variety of species, including deer, elk, neotropical and migratory birds, owls, amphibians, reptiles, pollinators and small mammals. Fencing associated with the project should help prevent illegal off-road driving, which has damaged these mesic systems in the recent past. Fence strand spacing followed wildlife-friendly fencing standards, with 16 inches from the ground to the first smooth wire, 6 inches to the first barbed wire, 8 inches to the next barbed wire, and the top smooth wires installed 42 inches above the ground to reduce ungulate entanglements. OHA tallied more than 1,000 volunteer hours with help from eight OHA chapters. “This project was a tremendous effort by a number of OHA chapters,” said OHA Conservation Director Tyler Dungannon. “More than 100 volunteers shed blood and sweat for the protection of these critical meadows, and bringing so many chapters together exponentiated our impact.” OHA obtained a $50,000 grant from the Oregon Conservation and Recreation Fund to complete the project.
Courtroom interior with orange text reading “MEASURE 114 DECISION DELAYED?”
By Oregon Hunters Association • September 25, 2026
Join OHA to protect hunting rights & wildlife habitats in Oregon. Stand with us to defend your heritage and access to nature.
By Ellen Condon • August 21, 2026
Bird’s Eye View
By Ellen Condon • August 5, 2026
OHA now shifts focus to proactive long-term protections.
By Ellen Condon • August 2, 2026
OHA launches Black-Tailed Deer & Roosevelt Elk Fund
By Ellen Condon • August 1, 2026
The U.S. Forest Service has proposed a revision to the Blue Mountains Forest Plan and offered three alternatives for consideration: Alternative 1 (no change) proposes continuing management under the existing 1990 Forest Plans and subsequent amendments. Alternative 2 replaces the 1990 plan with a new framework focused on restoring forest resilience through active management. It provides flexibility for vegetation treatments, prescribed fire, and timber harvest to improve forest health and restore desired forest conditions. This plan does not create fixed diameter limit for protecting large trees. It also updates riparian management, wildlife habitat direction, recreation management, grazing standards, and monitoring programs. Under Alternative 2, current designated roadless acres will be opened if the 2001 Roadless Rule rescission is upheld. Alternative 3 similarly prioritizes active management, but incorporates additional protections, such as permanently establishing the Inventoried Roadless Areas regardless of future changes to the national Roadless Rule. It also recommends approximately 34,000 acres of new Wilderness across the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. This alternative limits the harvest of large trees based on a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 21 or 30 inches, depending on species, and provides additional vegetation protections in riparian areas. “We are reviewing the draft (Environmental Impact Statement) and are working to ensure the Blue Mountains Forest Plan prioritizes our deer and elk herds, their habitat quality and security, which impacts their availability to hunters in the fall,” said Tyler Dungannon, OHA Conservation Director. “It’s important that we cut trees and open the forest canopy so light hits the forest floor, which will improve forage quality for deer and elk. It’s also imperative that open roads don’t cover the landscape. Without secure acreage on public lands, elk will leave. OHA is working to balance road access with habitat security to retain elk on public land where they are desired.” A public comment period was opened July 2 and lasts until Sept. 30. To review a draft environmental impact statement and for information on how to comment, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/r06/umatilla/planning/blue-mountains-forest-plan-revision
By Ellen Condon • July 31, 2026
The Baker Priority Area of Conservation in northeastern Oregon supports one of the most vulnerable greater sage-grouse populations in the state. Recent monitoring estimates the population at approximately 475 birds. Despite significant habitat restoration and predator management investments, the Baker population continues to decline, indicating demographic limitations – particularly recruitment and retention of breeding females – are constraining recovery. State OHA along with OHA’s Mid-Willamette and Baker County chapters are financially supporting a new translocation project aiming to increase the number of breeding females that successfully recruit locally within 1 to 2 years post-release. OHA is the reason that we still have sage-grouse hunting seasons today, and this is yet another example of our commitment to the species’ conservation.
By Ellen Condon • July 1, 2026
OHA, in partnership with ODFW, recently constructed a 3,500-foot buck-and-pole fence that will promote aspen regeneration and expansion, while improving habitat for wildlife on the Elkhorn Wildlife Area. OHA’s Mule Deer Fund awarded $10,000 to this project, and ODFW leveraged OHA funds to attain an additional $30,000, which covered the cost of materials for the project. The Union-Wallowa OHA Chapter provided volunteer labor and recruited help from local trap shooting teams (Eastern Oregon University and Union and La Grande high schools). The Union-Wallowa OHA Chapter also financially supported these trap shooting teams. “This project was a great example of how the OHA Mule Deer Fund catalyzes excellent work that will benefit deer, elk and other wildlife,” said OHA Conservation Director Tyler Dungannon. “OHA is fortunate to have chapters that not only financially contribute to our funds and projects, but also rally boots on the ground to implement projects, which exponentially increases our impact.” This project was one of five excellent projects that were selected for OHA Mule Deer Fund funding in 2025.
Show More